First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Smithsonian pulls video Catholic group calls 'sacrilegious'
 

By The Associated Press
12.01.10

WASHINGTON — The Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery removed a video yesterday that was part of an exhibit after complaints from a Catholic group that the images were sacrilegious.

Catholic League President Bill Donohue said the video by the late artist David Wojnarowicz depicting ants crawling on a crucifix was "hate speech" and designed to insult Christians.

After he was alerted to the piece on the evening of Nov. 29 by a New York Post reporter, Donohue began a campaign to urge Congress to cut public funding for the Smithsonian museum complex, he told the Associated Press. The exhibit opened Oct. 30.

"This is not the first time the Smithsonian has offended us," he said. "I'm going to cast my net much wider. Why should the government pay for this? ... How dare they take our money to fund attacks on (our religion)."

The Smithsonian receives public funding for its staff and facilities, but its exhibits are funded privately.

It's unusual for the Smithsonian to bow to public complaints so quickly, and curators were aware the exhibit could be controversial. Smithsonian spokeswoman Linda St. Thomas says the museum is responsive to its public audience but will stand behind the overall exhibit. The piece in question was on a video kiosk, and visitors had to call it up to view it. It was not a dominant part of the exhibit.

Donohue said his group had objected in the past to an article in Smithsonian magazine that he said was anti-Catholic and also to the museum featuring the work of artist Andres Serrano in 1996 because he had created a piece years earlier in which he placed a crucifix in his urine.

National Portrait Gallery Director Martin Sullivan said in a statement about the current video that Wojnarowicz's intention was to depict the suffering of an AIDS victim. He said the museum did not intend to offend anyone.

"I regret that some reports about the exhibit have created an impression that the video is intentionally sacrilegious," Sullivan said.

The video was made when the artist was suffering with AIDS in Mexico in the 1980s, Sullivan said. Part of the idea is that humans are made in Christ's image and that "we're all going back into the earth, that we're decaying," he said. Wojnarowicz died of AIDS in 1992.

"If you look at Latin American art and imagery, really over time there are a lot of portrayals of Christian iconography with suffering, agony and death," Sullivan said.

The piece is part of the first major museum exhibit to show how sexual orientation and gender identity have shaped American art. The exhibit of 105 works is on view through February.

Portrait Gallery spokeswoman Bethany Bentley says attention on the video "has become a distraction to the larger themes of the exhibition." No visitors complained about the exhibit the day after Thanksgiving, one of the museum's busiest days of the year, she said.

When told the Smithsonian removed the video, Donohue said he was "relieved they made the right decision" and that the removal relieves his objections "a great deal." He said he did not object to the exhibit as a whole but specifically to parts he considered anti-Christian.

In the past, the New York-based Catholic League has protested an exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum that included a portrait of the Virgin Mary, surrounded by elephant dung. Then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani called for city funding to the museum to be frozen, but a judge later ruled the move violated the First Amendment.

Donohue said he didn't believe the artwork at the Smithsonian was intended to portray an AIDS patient.

"If they're concerned about making a statement about AIDS, they could have chosen a better way to do it instead of insult us," he said. "I have more respect for art than these people do apparently."


Update
Smithsonian board seeks changes after video flap
Future potentially objectionable exhibits should not be changed without consultation, board says, but stands behind museum chief's decision to remove gay artist's controversial work. 02.01.11

Related

NYC, Brooklyn Museum come to terms over 'Sensation'

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and the city are barred from 'inflicting ... any punishment, retaliation, discrimination, or sanction of any kind' against the museum. 03.28.00

'Our Lady' controversy still chills Santa Fe museums

Museum officials say pressures not to offend viewers have been acute in the two years since outcry over Alma Lopez's collage of the Virgin of Guadalupe in flower petals with bare midriff. 05.20.03

Scalia: Government can have say in content of art it funds
'The First Amendment has not repealed the ancient rule of life, that he who pays the piper calls the tune,' Supreme Court justice tells audience at Julliard School. 09.23.05

Cave-in at Smithsonian, freedom crushed
By Charles C. Haynes Outcry against 11-second video of ants on a crucifix gets the artwork quickly censored — chilling artistic freedom. 12.01.10

Andres Serrano 'Speaking Freely' transcript

Public funding of controversial art

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 | 00:51:49
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
1 for All
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings®
Events
Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links