Attempts to do so thus far have been so broadly worded as to have prohibited a good deal of constitutionally protected expression, including movies containing scenes in which a minor “appears to be” involved in sexual activity. Those who resist such restrictions do so not out of fondness for child pornography but from a conviction that laws against child pornography — which is illegal — should remain focused on protecting actual children from harm rather than interfering in the imaginary world of virtual depictions in which no children are harmed.